Аннотация

Цель
To study the impact of online learning formats on satisfaction with the educational process among physicians and residents within the postgraduate medical education system
Материал и методы
A prospective observational study was conducted at the Center for Continuing Education of the State Educational Institution «Institute of Postgraduate Education in Healthcare of the Republic of Tajikistan» over a 6-month period in 2025. The study included 360 participants (180 physicians, 160 residents, and 20 interns) from various branches of the institute who completed 14 online lectures. A structured questionnaire was used to assess satisfaction with the learning format.
Результаты
The overall satisfaction rate with online learning was 78.3% (282 out of 360 participants). Interns showed the highest satisfaction (85.0%), while physicians with more than 10 years of experience reported the lowest (68.5%). Participants identified schedule flexibility (89.1%) and accessibility of materials (84.7%) as the main advantages. The key disadvantages were technical problems (31.4%) and a lack of practical skills development (27.8%)
Заключение
Distance learning demonstrated high acceptability among medical professionals, particularly junior specialists. It is necessary to modify approaches to enhance the engagement of experienced physicians and to integrate practical components into the online format.

Ключевые слова

distance learning medical education postgraduate education technologies

Полный текст

Скачать статью в PDF

Полная версия статьи в формате PDF

Список литературы

  1. Dunleavy G, Nikolaou CK, Nifakos S, Atun R, Law GCY, Tudor Car L. Mobile digital education for health professions: systematic review and meta-analysis by the Digital Health Education Collaboration. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(2):e12937. doi: 10.2196/12937
  2. Yang W, Wang YX, Tan K. [Student satisfaction survey of postgraduate programs of clinical medicine at regional medical schools and the influencing factors]. 2022;53(3):426-430. doi: 10.12182/20220560305
  3. Waterhouse P, Samra R, Lucassen M. Distance education students’ satisfaction: do work and family roles matter? Distance Educ. 2022;43(1):56-77. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2021.2020622
  4. Kuchynska I, Bobkovych KO, Davydova NN, Polishchuk S, Shumeiko O, Prysiazniuk I. Distance education as an alternative form of learning in a pandemic condition. Sabiedrība, integrācija, izglītība. 2022;1:157-167. doi: 10.17770/sie2022vol1.6863
  5. Кульчицький В, Гуменна Н. Self-education of future specialists in the medical field in the conditions of distance learning. Nauka ì tehnìka sʹogodnì. 2022;12(12). doi: 10.52058/2786-6025-2022-12(12)-87-95
  6. The transition to remote education format in medical university: opinion of students about transformation of education process at the outset of COVID-19 pandemic. Probl Sotsialnoi Gig Zdravookhranenniiai Istor Med. 2022;30(3). doi: 10.32687/0869-866x-2022-30-3-364-370
  7. Ghasempour S, Esmaeeli M, Abbasi A, Hosseinzadeh A, Ebrahimi H. Relationship between academic success, distance education learning environments, and its related factors among medical sciences students: a cross-sectional study. BMC Med Educ. 2023;23. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04856-3
  8. Bukataeva AB, Ovcharov AV. Satisfaction with the quality of distance education at a medical university during quarantine measures. Vestnik Rossijskogo universiteta družby narodov. 2023. doi: 10.22363/2312-8631-2023-20-3-328-336
  9. Toraman Ç, Karadağ E, Polat M. Validity and reliability evidence for the scale of distance education satisfaction of medical students based on item response theory (IRT). BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1). doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03153-9
  10. Kagan MM. Telemedicine and medical education: a mixed methods systematic review protocol. JBI Evid Synth. 2022;20(12):3045-57. doi: 10.11124/jbies-21-00481
  11. Vogt L, Schmidt MK, Follmann A, Lenes A, Klasen M, Sopka S. Telemedicine in medical education: an example of a digital preparatory course for the clinical traineeship – a pre-post comparison. GMS J Med Educ. 2022;39(4):Doc46. doi: 10.3205/zma001567
  12. Kesen Mutlu A, Kilinc A, Ozcan L, Tepetas M, Metintaş S, Onsuz MF. Evaluation of telemedicine awareness, knowledge, attitude, skill levels of physicians and students. Eur J Public Health. 2022;32(Suppl 3). doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckac130.064
  13. Chu M, Dalwadi S, Profit R, Searle B, Williams H. How should medical education support increasing telemedicine use following COVID-19? An Asian perspective focused on teleconsultation. Int J Digit Health. 2022;2(1). doi: 10.29337/ijdh.46